Time To Get The Kings Out Of Sacramento

Vivek Ranadive, left, and Mayor Kevin Johnson saved Sacramento’s NBA franchise. Ranadive has a chance to remake it with a name change heading into the new downtown arena in 2016. Mandatory Credit: Kelley L Cox-USA TODAY Sports

It’s time to get the Kings out of Sacramento.

No, no, no. I don’t mean the team. Mayor Kevin Johnson and new owner Vivek Ranadive did a great thing by keeping the Maloofs from allowing the team to be sold and moved to Seattle last spring.

But it’s definitely time for the Kings to leave Sacramento … as in the nickname.

There has already been one franchise rebirth this season in the NBA, as the newly named Pelicans are proving to be a pleasant surprise in New Orleans after the transplanted Hornets nickname was abandoned this year.

Charlotte will get its identity back next year when the dreadful Bobcats name is consigned to the dustbin of history in favor of the city’s historic (and I do mean historic, like Revolutionary War historic) identity as the Hornets.

The Sacramento franchise has more than 60 years of history behind it. But some of that history is ancient history:

  • The franchise’s lone championship was earned in 1951, three cities and one nickname ago.
  • The franchise’s greatest player toiled in Cincinnati, two stops ago and under a different nickname.
  • The “Kings” nickname only happened because when the franchise—then known as the Royals—was abandoning Cincinnati for Kansas City in the early 1970s, there was already a team known as the Kansas City Royals. Creative thinkers that they were, the powers-that-be in charge of the franchise changed the name from Royals to Kings.

RochesterRoyals_46The franchise came into being as the Rochester Royals, in the small city of Rochester in upstate New York in 1945 in the old National Basketball League. The Royals made played for the NBL title in all three seasons it played in the NBL, winning the crown in its inaugural season in 1945-46.

RochesterRoyals_46_57In 1948, along with the Minneapolis Lakers and Fort Wayne Pistons, the Royals jumped to the upstart Basketball Association of America, which had launched in 1946. They finished with the BAA’s best record, but lost in the Western Division Finals to the Lakers (a common theme in the franchise’s early history).

The NBL and BAA merged in 1949 to become the NBA and the Royals were an early power, winning the championship in 1951 and making the playoffs in each of their first seven seasons.

CincinnatiRoyals_57_71But Rochester wasn’t a large enough market to compete in the NBA and in 1957, the club relocated to Cincinnati. It didn’t have quite as much success there. In 15 seasons, the Royals reached the playoffs just seven times, and that was with the franchise’s greatest player—Oscar Robertson—on board from 1960 until he was traded in 1970.

KansasCityOmahaKingsIn 1972, the team picked up stakes and moved again, this time to Kansas City, but with the plan of playing eight home games a season in the basketball hotbed of Omaha, Neb. The Kansas City-Omaha Kings were long on name, short on wins. In 1975, the “Omaha” part of the name was dropped and the team achieved a dubious distinction in 1981, when it became one of the last two teams with losing records to reach the conference finals.

KansasCityKingsThe Kings qualified for the playoffs with a 40-42 record, upset the Portland Trail Blazers in the first round of the playoffs and stunned Pacific Division champion Phoenix in the conference semifinals to set up a meeting with the 40-42 Houston Rockets, who blasted the Kings in five games to become the last team with a losing record to reach the NBA Finals.

SacramentoKingsOldThe move to Sacramento came in 1985 as Kings ownership made good on its threat to move if Kansas City didn’t pony up a new arena.

Since coming to Sacramento nearly three decades ago, the Kings have made just 10 playoff appearances. Eight of those were consecutive, the glory years under Rick Adelman from 1998-99 through 2005-06.

SacramentoKingsNewAdelman coached the team to a .633 winning percentage in his eight seasons and the Kings experienced one of the most agonizing defeats in NBA history in the 2002 Western Conference Finals, when the Los Angeles Lakers beat the Kings (or were awarded a win over the Kings, depending on how your perspective) in Game 6 and bounced back to win Game 7 at Arco Arena.

Besides the Adelman era, however, there is little but heartache and misery to hold onto.

  • The Phil Johnson era lasted parts of two seasons, resulted in a 51-77 record and a three-game sweep in the 1986 playoffs.
  • Bill Russell brought a Hall of Fame resume to Sacramento and left 58 games into the 1987-88 season with a 17-41 record.
  • Dick Motta won an NBA title with Washington in the 1970s. He won 48 games and lost 113 of them over parts of three seasons in the 1990s.
  • There was the famous 1990 NBA Draft, when general manager Jerry Reynolds had four (FOUR!) first-round picks and turned them into Lionel Simmons (No. 7 overall), Travis Mays (No. 14), Duane Causwell (No. 18) and Anthony Bonner (No. 23). Reynolds followed that up with Billy Owens (No. 3 overall) and Pete Chilcutt (No. 27) in 1991. Six first-round picks in two years and Reynolds turned it into … well, not much.

So why not embrace change?

A new arena is going to be opening in downtown Sacramento at some point in the near future (2016 is the target date). Why not go into the new building with the idea of creating a whole new identity for the franchise?

Abandon the Kings name, a name that is—at best—remembered for falling short in the postseason, of having a potential NBA Finals bid taken away by incompetent officials and for losing … lots and lots of losing.

Try something new. Something that doesn’t have the stink of almost 70 years of mostly bad times. Something uniquely Californian.

Call me crazy, but the Sacramento Condors seems to have a nice ring to it. I don’t know–just something that hasn’t been dragged across the country through three other cities (or four, if you count Omaha) and not one of those singular-plurals like “Cardinal” or “Heat.”

The point is simply this: Write a new history. Remember the old, but move forward with the new.

Oh, and ditch the purple-and-black while you’re at it. The 1990s are long since done.

Topics: Sacramento Kings

Want more from Golden Gate Sports?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Dimas Arteaga

    Nah keep the kings. Condors is dumb as fuck.

    • Phil Watson

      Condors isn’t a locked-in-stone, it-has-to-be-this idea. Just a suggestion. The idea is that the new arena is a chance for Sacramento to make it own history with a name that hasn’t been dragged all the way across the country through three other towns.

      • CJ

        I think this is unquestionably an awful idea. As Sacramento Kings fans we’re thrilled about the rebirth of our franchise. We now have the opportunity to contend for our first championship. You’re clearly not a Kings fan and wouldn’t comprehend the importance of our history to us. We treasure all the moments from Mitch winning MVP at the all-star game to waiting in line at ungodly hours for our bobble heads. It’s an opportunity to be victorious as Kings and transform the national perspective of our team, not hide the past and succeed as Condors or some foolish other name that has no meaning. I do however support the idea of a logo/color change as it would fittingly signify a change, but LONG LIVE THE KINGS! Come ‘On Man!

        • Phil Watson

          Great points, CJ. Thanks for weighing in.

      • Dimas Arteaga

        Love the Kings. Purple and Black is the team color I know. First Kings game I’ve been to was Kings vs Suns when Jason Williams was on the team. The Kings lost but the game was exciting. Since then I’ve been a fan of The NBA and Kings Basketball. So that’s why I was so affended by the suggested name change and color scheme. My favorite jerseys happen to black and purple. The only thing that needs to change in Sac is the losing record and bandwagon Warrior fans

        • Phil Watson

          That’s a point I didn’t really think about because, well, I’m old … lol. For younger fans, they’ve always been the Sacramento Kings. In any event, I appreciate the feedback. If nothing else, it’s been a fun discussion.

  • Dimas Arteaga

    Article is lame and a waste

  • Greg

    How about change the name of the Warriors… Warriors put up a fight when in battle and up until recent years those “warriors” simply laid down and quivered …. Not much of a Warrior if you ask me… So shut up with this BS…worry about your own damn team and change your name… something with Regional relevance…. Golden State Seals, or Golden State Seagulls…. Ya shut it

    • Phil Watson

      So I’ll take this as a “no,” I suppose.

  • Alberto V

    We need to win as the Sacramento Kings.